I came across a RWW post entitled "10 Inspiring TED Talks for Startups", and being an avid TED watcher I thought I'd take them all for a spin. I pulled a muscle in my back and it only hurts when I move/breathe, so I didn't feel guilty watching TED videos for a bunch of hours on end.
There were some I'd seen before, and some that I don't want to watch again. Long story short, the TED website slice and dice their content a zillion different ways, providing many ways to discover and consume the 'best' talks, including a top 10. My advice, is that there are more interesting talks for the intellectually curious, including those who have a bent on starting a startup.
Nevertheless, if all of the talks on the list are new to you, my picks would include: 1, 3, 4, 7, 9.
Like most TED talks, there is a key thesis or idea in each talk and a whole lot of analogy and case studies designed to make you understand/think you had the idea yourself. Naturally, I didn't consume them passively, see below for my 'workings out' (notes).
- Simon Sinek: How great leaders inspire action.
- Golden Circle: Why, How, What (start with what and work in)
- Great leaders invert the circle (start with why and work out)
- People don't buy what you do, they buy why you do it
- Examples: Wright Brothers, Apple, Martin Luther King
- Why speaks to decision making centers in the brain (limbic), What speaks to rational/language centers (prefrontal cortex).
- Communicate your "why" (belief, purpose, vision) and let people buy in for themselves, then try to sell them the "what" and "how".
- Sell to people, hire people who believe what you believe.
- There are leaders and those who lead (power vs inspiration).
- Adora Svitak: What adults can learn from kids.
- Childish - dreams for perfection (unconstrained optimism)
- Adult - reasons not to do things (focus on constraints)!
- Kids think of good ideas, not thinking within traditional limitations.
- Learning between adults-kids should be reciprocal.
- Larry Lessig on laws that choke creativity.
- User generated content - how to open it up.
- Avoid top-down, professionalized, read-only culture, seek read-write and participative.
- cases: talking machines killing culture, flights a trespassers over the land below, broadcasting, BMI a more democratic management of music content.
- Revive the read-write culture using digital technology.
- User generated content - amateur culture - produce for the love not the money.
- Remixing content - not piracy, recreating with existing content.
- Democratizing techniques (digital techniques - tools of technology become tools of literacy) - say things differently.
- Architecture of copyright law - makes remix illegal, everything is a copy online.
- Adopt permissive non-commercial licenses, need private solution like BMI, let competition in the marketplace solve this problem.
- Dan Pink on the surprising science of motivation.
- Candle problem - example of overcoming cognitive fixedness.
- Control vs rewards/competition, reward motivation can make them perform worse.
- On lots of tasks incentives don't help and can make things worse.
- Incentives really only work well for simple problems, narrow focus with well defined constraints.
- rewards narrow focus, hamper creativity
- The creative problems are more of the types of problems we do now - the easy problems are outsourced and automated.
- Use intrinsic motivation: autonomy, mastery, purpose over extrinsic (carrot and stick).
- Engagement: self-direction works better than management.
- Examples: Atlassian and Google (20% time), Wikipedia vs MS Encarta
- Rory Sutherland: Sweat the small stuff.
- Worry about the little things (marketing and if you want to make a difference).
- The little things are the things that people remember.
- Behavior change inverse to the amount of force applied.
- The big stuff has money and is done well.
- too powerful, too high level
- people with the power want to do the big expensive things
- makes the high salaries seem worth while
- The small stuff is done badly - the user interface.
- We want input and change to be proportional (Newtonian)
- Reality is much more complex
- This is not the world, small change has big effect. (complexity theory)
- Need to look for those small risky things that can have a huge effect.
- Need a name for this, very important.
- chief detail officer
- Seth Godin on standing out.
- Case study on sliced bread patent focused on how to make it, was a failure for 15 years, took good marketing to take off.
- This is the century of ideas diffusion (those who are best at it, win).
- We are currently focus on trying to get the front page on google, how to grab attention.
- Advertising is currently all about interrupting the consumer.
- Consumers don't care, too much choices, too little time, they ignore stuff.
- Purple cow - you need to stand out - is it remarkable (worth commenting on).
- We're all in the fashion business now - not about interrupting people.
- old: mass marketing: average products for normal people
- new: never market to normal people, market to innovators and early adopters - then word of mouth will push it into mainstream
- You need a group that cares about what you have to say.
- Find out what people really want, then give it to them.
- Riskiest thing you can do is being safe - the safe thing now is being remarkable
- Being very good is boring. (get scrappy?)
- Malcolm Gladwell on spaghetti sauce.
- Breakthrough: There is no best Pepsi, there is best Pepsi's.
- Spaghetti sauce.
- Created a search space, tested the space.
- Measured the modality of the space - the peaks
- three groups: plain, spicy, extra chunky
- pickles: regular and zesty
- You need to provide choice - multimodal not unimodal distributions of preference.
- This changed the way the food industry makes you happy
- old way: what do you want in product? always wrong, people don't know what they want
- new way: horizontal segmentation. trial lots of things, collect data and analyze
- Mustard's: french and golden, then dijon
- lesson: make them aspire to something - a better product, sophistication (wrong!)
- It is not a hierarchy, it is a plain, a spectrum with clusters of preference.
- You no longer you have a platonic dish.
- authentic dish was the way to go, seeking cooking universals
- Now - the understanding of variability
- interested in the details of the differences
- Jan Chipchase on our mobile phones.
- Types of possessions: owned, consider, carry, use
- 3 most important things: keys, money, mobile phone
- core reason: survival (lowest level in Maslow's hierarchy of needs)
- mobile phone can transcend space and time (call, and sync messages)
- personal and convenient
- methods for avoiding forgetting: tap your pockets, turn around, rituals
- center of gravity - where you look for things
- never forget: have nothing to remember
- art of delegate
- Turn phone into ATM in Africa
- decentralized, street innovation
- peoples identity is mobile
- effects of everyone having a mobile phone: immediacy of ideas, immediacy of objects (adoption), the street will innovate despite you in ways you cannot anticipate (design), direction of conversation (learning how to listen)
- Clay Shirky: How cognitive surplus will change the world.
- 20th Century taught us how to be good consumers, now new media gives us all an ability to also be producers
- Cognitive Surplus - enabling ability of digital media and contribution of peoples free time (ability to create, ability to share)
- Examples: Ushahidi and LOL cats. Difference is LOLCats is communal value (the group), Ushahidi is civic value (good of society).
- Once you allow creation/experiments, you have to allow the spectrum, the Ushahidi and the LOL Cats (gap is between doing anything and doing nothing)
- Design for generosity - manage economic contracts (money for goods and services) and your social contract (being good) - they are different and incompatible .
- Only going to get more participation, both types of value, but the latter value will change our society.
- Chip Conley: Measuring what makes life worthwhile.
- Finding meaning makes you happy.
- Hierarchy of needs - Maslow
- apply hierarchy of the individual to the business
- survival, success, transformation: for business/life
- Adoption results in lowered turnover, increased customer loyalty
- manage what you can measure - old way
- need to manage the intangible (top of the pyramid)
- we think they are important - no idea how to measure them
- an alternative measure of success: gross domestic happiness (GMH)
- start measuring and monitoring happiness
- about creating the conditions for happiness to happen
- have lots of indicators, questions, etc
- emotional equation
- happiness: wanting what have (gratitude) / having what you want (gratification)
- USA/West are a bottom heavy culture
- happiness is not an object
- GDP is important although doesn't count a lot of things that matter to us in life
- maximizing GDP optimizes tangible success, but not tangible happiness
- need to create conditions for happiness
- can have inspired employees and tangible profits
- what counts?



1 comments:
Don't forget this little gem: TED's Chris Anderson answers Reddit's questions.
Chris is a TED curator and provides links to some of the must-see TED talks.
Post a Comment